Physica ZUK
LimaCorporate
Physica ZUK
Best performing UKA at 5, 10 & 15yrs (1). Physica ZUK offers an unchanged design for more than 15 years.
BENEFITS
- Proven clinical heritage – Best performing UKA at 5, 10 & 15yrs (1) with its unchanged design for more than 15 years is supporting repeatable and reproducible results (2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
- Optimising function – The fixed bearing design is reducing post-operative complications of bearing dislocation (7), improving functional outcomes and FJS (8)
- Precision execution – Simple and easy-to-use instrument set for fine-tuning preparation and repeatable and reproducible surgical technique. Same implant for Medial and Lateral UKA
Physica ZUK offers an unchanged design for more than 15 years. Fixed bearing design with metal tibial baseplate + liner & all-poly tibia options, universal tibial and femoral components for lateral and medial UKA and universal tibial/femoral compatibility.
Physica ZUK has a PMMA coating on femoral and metal tibial components for advanced cement adhesion.
1. National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland (NJR). Implant Summary Report on Physica ZUK. Hemel Hempstead (UK): NJR Centre. 2022 Feb.
NJR Disclaimer The data used for this analysis was obtained from the National Joint Registry (“NJR”). The Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (“HQIP”), the NJR and/or its contractor, Northgate Public Services (UK) Limited (“NPS”) take no responsibility for the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of any data used or referred to in this report, nor for the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of links or references to other information sources and disclaims all warranties in relation to such data, links and references to the maximum extent permitted by legislation.
2. Gill JR et al, “Clinical results and 12-year survivorship of the Physica ZUK unicompartmental knee replacement”, Knee, 2019 Jun;26(3):750-758.
3. Vasso M et al, “Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is effective: ten year results”, Int Orthop, 2015 Dec;39(12):2341-6.
4. De Grave P et al, “Outcomes of a Fixed-Bearing, Medial, Cemented Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Design: Survival Analysis and Functional Score of 460 Cases”, J Arth, 2018 Sep;33(9):2792-2799.
5. Biswas D et al “Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients less than 55 years old: minimum of two years of follow-up”, J Arth, 2014 Jan;29(1):101-5.
6. R.I.P.O. (Register of the Orthopaedic Prosthetic Implants) Annual report 2019, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
7. Kim Tae K et al, “Clinical Results of Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum 2-Year Follow-up”, CiOS, 2016 Dec;8(4):386-392.
8. Gill JR et al, “Forgotten Joint Score: Comparison between total and unicondylar knee arthroplasty”, Knee, 2021 Mar;29:26-32.
Enquire
For further information, questions regarding this product, or to discuss alternative solutions, please get in touch with your local Sales Specialist or our Head Office using the form or the contact details at the bottom of the page.
Stay in touch
NEWSLETTER
Sign up to receive email updates on new product announcements, insights on surgical techniques from surgeons, specialists, and sales representatives and industry trends, such as changes in regulations and new research findings.
